Photo credit: www.sciencedaily.com

Marine Protection Efforts Poised for Transformation in 2025

Is 2025 set to usher in a new era for marine protection initiatives? A group of committed researchers, including Octavio Aburto from UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography, believes that this pivotal moment has arrived.

A recent study released on February 6 in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science introduces an innovative concept known as Marine Prosperity Areas (MPpAs). This initiative, spearheaded by Aburto and a diverse team of marine scientists and economists, emphasizes the intertwined fates of human well-being and the revitalization of marine and coastal ecosystems.

Marine Prosperity Areas represent a significant shift in marine conservation strategies, aiming to leverage targeted financial investments to improve community prosperity while concurrently restoring ecological balance. To make this vision a reality, the researchers are appealing to governments, non-profit organizations, and local stakeholders to embrace MPpAs as a fundamental element of global conservation policies, hence fostering the requisite partnerships and investments for a sustainable future.

“Traditionally, conservation asks communities to make sacrifices today for long-term benefits that may not materialize for decades—an unrealistic expectation for those grappling with urgent socio-economic issues,” noted Aburto, who serves as the study’s lead author and is a professor at Scripps Oceanography. “Our framework for Marine Prosperity Areas directly confronts this dilemma by demonstrating how enhancing human prosperity can go hand in hand with ecological restoration. With a focused approach, we can harmonize the needs of both communities and ecosystems.”

The authors argue that if effectively enacted, Marine Prosperity Areas could play a crucial role in meeting ambitious global conservation objectives, including the “30 by 30” commitment outlined in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which aims to safeguard 30% of the world’s oceans by the year 2030.

This new framework builds on decades of research into Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), fisheries, and coastal ecosystems, particularly in regions like the Baja California Peninsula and the Gulf of California—recognized as one of the most vital marine ecosystems globally. The authors emphasize the necessity of rethinking the current approach to marine protections, given that previous efforts lacked a cohesive operational framework. Their model integrates financial strategies and bespoke community collaborations, bridging ecological conservation, economic development, and social policy to benefit both society and the environment.

For instance, in pristine marine regions, initial funding could facilitate ecotourism initiatives that empower local communities through diving and snorkeling ventures. Alternatively, localized grants could support sustainable aquaculture projects or innovative schemes like artificial reefs to bolster ecological restoration. The overarching aim is to create diverse economic opportunities, allowing community members to manage natural resources sustainably while promoting economic growth.

“The idea behind Marine Prosperity Areas serves to create synergies between environmental health and social welfare,” stated study co-author Alfredo Giron, a former Scripps Oceanography student who now leads the World Economic Forum’s Ocean Action Agenda. “Recognizing the intricate connections between nature and humanity is vital as we develop marine management strategies that yield positive outcomes for both realms.”

The Three Phases of Marine Prosperity Areas

The authors delineate three key phases, termed “Pillars on Intervention,” essential for establishing a Marine Prosperity Area:

Community Engagement and Co-Design: This initial phase aims to mobilize community members and engage all stakeholders in defining what prosperity means for them and collaboratively envisioning how to achieve it. Emphasis is placed on co-developing sustainable marine resource strategies that resonate with local expectations and foster inclusion.

Capacity Building, Governance, and Infrastructure: In this second phase, foundational elements for the Marine Prosperity Area will be established. This involves enhancing community capabilities to design and execute the MPpA, creating a governance framework with legal mechanisms for oversight, incorporating conflict resolution processes, and developing necessary enforcement infrastructure.

Monitoring, Enforcement, and Co-Management: The final phase revolves around implementing a collaborative management system. Here, robust monitoring and enforcement protocols are critical, as they enable data collection that informs ongoing management decisions and empowers stakeholders to foster prosperous outcomes across social and ecological dimensions.

The proposed framework represents an ambitious yet long-term vision that utilizes established community-based intervention strategies to enhance access to environmental science, social services, and benefits from the blue economy.

“This model is a comprehensive pathway to achieving impactful conservation that uplifts both communities and the environment, contingent upon prioritizing investment and proactive participation,” remarked co-author Catalina Lopez, director of the Gulf of California Marine Program at the Institute of the Americas.

The study draws lessons from several successful marine protection examples, including the Cabo Pulmo National Marine Park established in 1995. Once severely affected by overfishing and pollution, this marine reserve experienced a successful recovery due to collaborative conservation efforts among scientists, the Mexican government, and the Cabo Pulmo community, resulting in revitalized fish populations and economic benefits.

Other notable cases, such as those in La Paz and Santa Maria Bay, also contributed insights that shaped the framework, all emphasizing strong community engagement and sustainable financing as vital elements for success.

However, challenges exist. Some marine protection initiatives fell short due to insufficient community support stemming from financial hardship on the path to ecological recovery. The new framework aims to alleviate these difficulties through proactive funding for human prosperity as a precursor to, rather than a consequence of, ecosystem restoration.

It also seeks to balance the diverse interests of various stakeholders, from industries reliant on marine resources to Indigenous communities and underrepresented groups.

“Sustaining support for this initiative throughout all stages will be one of the most significant hurdles,” expressed co-author Valentina Platzgummer, who coordinates the Conservation Leadership Program at Centro para la Biodiversidad Marina y la Conservación, A.C. “Long-term commitment from all stakeholders, including funding and involvement, will be vital to successfully navigating the complexities of this framework.”

The authors highlighted a growing enthusiasm among individuals and organizations eager to engage with concepts like Marine Prosperity Areas. This collective desire for collaboration will be crucial in ensuring the longevity of any conservation endeavors.

“The willingness to cooperate is fundamental, and with organized efforts, I believe we can achieve the transformational change necessary to preserve and sustain our oceans,” added study co-author Rocío Abud Mirabent, director of Fundación Coppel, which partners with various organizations to enhance the lives of individuals in Mexico.

Overall, the Marine Prosperity Area framework presents an optimistic outlook where thriving ecosystems and prosperous communities can coexist, mending the relationship between humanity and the ocean. Furthermore, its adaptable design positions it for potential global application.

“This vision is not only attainable but critical for our collective well-being as we confront intensifying environmental and social issues,” the authors concluded.

Additional contributors to the study include Erica Ferrer from UC Santa Cruz, América Ávalos Galindo and Claudia Núñez Sañudo of Fundación Coppel in Mexico, Fabio Favoretto from Scripps Oceanography, Isabel Mendoza Camacho of SUCEDE Sociedad en Acción Sinaloa in Mexico, Marisol Plascencia de La Cruz from Centro para la Biodiversidad Marina y la Conservación in Mexico, and Alejandro Robles from NOS Noroeste Sustentable in Mexico.

Funding sources for the individual research team members involved various foundations, including the Mary Jameson Foundation, the Baum Foundation, the UC Santa Cruz Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Fellowship program, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

Source
www.sciencedaily.com