Photo credit: hechingerreport.org

Challenges in Eighth Grade Algebra Access for Students

Achieving proficiency in Algebra 1 by eighth grade is a crucial milestone in the educational journey of students. This foundational course not only opens doors to advanced mathematics but also significantly correlates with better prospects for college graduation and higher income levels in the future. Dan Goldhaber, an economist at the American Institutes for Research, emphasized in a recent webinar that “Algebra in eighth grade is a gateway to a lot of further opportunities.”

However, a concerning disparity exists regarding the access to Algebra 1, particularly among Black and Hispanic students, as well as low-income students from across all racial backgrounds. According to the latest statistics from the U.S. Department of Education, only 13 percent of Black students successfully passed Algebra 1 in eighth grade in 2021, in stark contrast to 25 percent of their white counterparts.

To better understand these disparities, researchers are examining various factors that hinder access to algebra at lower-income middle schools, where populations of Black and Hispanic students are disproportionately represented. A series of surveys conducted by RAND, a research organization, highlights three main issues: many of these schools do not offer Algebra 1, teachers often lack proper training and expertise in mathematics, and classroom time is utilized differently compared to more affluent institutions. As a result, many capable students in under-resourced areas do not receive the algebra instruction necessary to prepare them adequately.

In the 2023 and 2024 academic years, RAND surveyed over 3,000 school principals and nearly 1,000 math teachers across the nation. These educators were selected as part of a representative national sample that captures the demographics of the U.S. student population. A working paper detailing some of these findings was published in October 2024, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation among other supporters of The Hechinger Report.

The disparities between the poorest and richest schools are stark. Nearly a quarter of the highest poverty schools did not offer Algebra 1 to eighth graders, while only 6 percent of the wealthiest institutions lacked it in their curriculum. Additionally, there is a significant difference in the adoption of an algebra-for-all policy: around half of the affluent schools provided Algebra 1 to all eighth graders, regardless of their proficiency, compared to only about a third of the impoverished schools.

Teachers at high-poverty schools frequently exhibit less professional preparation. Many of them enter the teaching field through alternative certification paths rather than traditional education degrees, often bypassing critical components such as supervised student teaching. Moreover, these educators are less likely to possess advanced degrees or specialized mathematics credentials.

Survey results indicate that approximately one-third of math teachers in lower-income schools reported dedicating more than half of their instructional time to topics below the expected grade level, alongside managing classroom behavior. An instructional approach heavily reliant on lectures was more prevalent in these schools than in those with greater resources. Furthermore, while disparities in teaching quality exist across racial lines, they are more pronounced by income level, suggesting that economic status may be a more significant challenge than racial bias in educational settings.

Efforts aimed at increasing the number of eighth graders enrolled in Algebra 1 courses have sometimes inadvertently placed unprepared students in a tough position. Goldhaber noted that simply assigning students to an Algebra 1 class does not guarantee success; often, this can lead to failure if the coursework is too challenging or if the curriculum provided is inadequate. Without a robust post-algebra curriculum to follow, the advantages of early algebra exposure may not be realized.

From an economic perspective, many low-income schools may find it impractical to offer Algebra 1 courses when only a small cohort of students is ready for such instruction. Hiring a specialized teacher for just a few students can strain already limited resources, making it imperative to consider alternative investment approaches that could benefit a larger number of learners. Goldhaber acknowledged the complexities of addressing these issues within the school framework.

One potential solution lies in improving the quality of math teachers in under-resourced schools. Suggestions include providing financial incentives to attract skilled math educators to these areas, although such measures would inevitably require extensive negotiations regarding union contracts. Even with incentives, the overall shortage of qualified math teachers poses a significant challenge.

To tackle these issues effectively, Goldhaber advocates for early intervention, suggesting that enhancing elementary education can lay a strong foundation in math skills for low-income students. “Do it before middle school,” he asserted, indicating that middle school may be too late for many students to catch up.

Source
hechingerreport.org