Photo credit: www.theguardian.com

Bristol Council Faces Backlash Over Livable Neighborhood Scheme

Katie Sullivan stands at a bustling intersection in east Bristol, recalling the four hours she spent in the chilly air last week, determined to thwart council workers from establishing a bus gate. This marked the third significant demonstration by local residents against the proposed “livable neighborhood” initiative championed by the Green-led city council.

“We’re furious the council is doing this to us,” Sullivan expressed, a nearby resident. “This scheme isn’t addressing the problem that the council claims it wants to solve… the impact on our daily lives is monumental.”

The recent protest attracted over 30 participants, many of whom belong to a Facebook group boasting nearly 3,000 members. They contend that the plan—which seeks to diminish traffic and enhance air quality by limiting access for private vehicles—actually complicates travel for those who must drive for various legitimate reasons, such as mobility challenges or shift work.

Discontent was palpable when Heather Mack, the Green deputy leader, and John Smith, the executive director, faced vocal protests as they approached last week’s rally. The event has become a symbol of broader discontent within the community.

One resident criticized the council’s focus on Barton Hill—a district noted for its high poverty levels. “Why here?” she questioned. “Fifty-five percent of children in Barton Hill live in poverty. We desperately need a pharmacy, a dentist, and better access to doctor appointments.”

This unfolding drama is just part of the difficulties facing Bristol’s Green council, which made history last May as the first major UK city to be governed by the Greens. Recently, the council found itself under scrutiny when it was reported that it might implement a shift to collecting black bins every four weeks, a move that could potentially save £2.3 million annually to reallocate to other critical services while simultaneously aiding recycling efforts.

However, this proposal has ignited significant opposition, with over 7,500 signatures gathered against it. Even within the Green Party ranks, discomfort is growing. Danica Priest, a former Green candidate, expressed concerns that constituents may turn away from the party due to rising council tax costs coupled with diminishing services. “Bins are one of local government’s primary responsibilities, and if those aren’t being collected, that’s all people will focus on,” she remarked.

The council is also grappling with the need to cut additional services. Insufficient government funding to meet escalating demands has created a budgetary shortfall. The council’s first comprehensive budget is expected to seek approximately £43.1 million in savings for the next financial year.

Initial proposals for cost reductions—including library closures and the potential suspension of museum services—triggered immediate backlash, compelling the council to withdraw these ideas at least for the upcoming budget cycle. Council leader Tony Dyer, aware that steering Bristol would be an uphill battle, admitted he was surprised by the extent of the financial challenges: “It was a bit like purchasing a vehicle without examining its condition—then realizing the engine is in dire shape,” he reflected.

Having experienced growing up in a distressed council estate himself, Dyer emphasizes that austerity measures have not ended even under the current Labour government. He notes, “While Bristol’s funding has seen a nominal increase of 5.2% in real terms, the demand for services is escalating at a rate far greater.”

For a party that sought a mandate to safeguard the vulnerable from harsh cuts, Dyer acknowledges the tough choices ahead, which may include reductions to social care packages. “These will not be easy or painless cuts. Any changes inevitably mean someone will be adversely affected. It’s incredibly disheartening,” he stated.

Many in the Green Party feel apprehension about the example set by Brighton, where Green councillors succeeded in implementing austerity cuts dictated by the previous coalition government, leading to a prolonged dispute with refuse workers. Now, Brighton’s Green representation is minimal, holding only eight council seats, marginally above that of the Conservatives.

Dyer maintains that Bristol’s situation will be distinct, expressing hope that the upcoming government spending review will provide more financial support. “We’ve learned valuable lessons. The key here will be our implementation,” he asserted.

Despite the discontent, Dyer believes the council is not under siege. He understands the skepticism from residents in Barton Hill, who have historically felt abandoned. However, he remains committed to advancing the livable neighborhood initiative, despite doubts about maintaining bi-weekly bin collections. “We must face the hard reality of financial difficulties on the horizon,” he stated.

Conversely, advocates for the livable neighborhood are eager to voice their support. Tim Northover, an ambulance workers’ union representative and Barton Hill resident, argues that many locals are willing to support the scheme, as it intends to create safer environments for children to walk and cycle. “Green party councillors were elected on the promise to implement this initiative. They received strong community backing, thus enjoying a democratic mandate,” he added.

Source
www.theguardian.com