Photo credit: www.sciencedaily.com
In a groundbreaking investigation, researchers at the Florida Museum of Natural History have leveraged data from a longstanding program overseen by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, spanning over a century, to examine the impact of non-native species on local ecosystems.
The study encompasses an extraordinary dataset featuring over 5 million measurements from trees across much of eastern North America. Findings illustrate a worrying trend: the proliferation of introduced species has accelerated significantly in the last twenty years, leading to a decline in native tree diversity in areas where these non-native species have gained a foothold.
While it may seem intuitive that the emergence of non-native species would correlate with a decline in native ones, this study is notable for demonstrating this relationship comprehensively on a large scale for the first time.
“There’s a prevailing assumption that non-native species are problematic, yet we often lack clarity on the implications of their presence,” remarked Doug Soltis, a distinguished professor at the Florida Museum and a co-author of the study. “Previous research has focused on localized effects, whereas our approach adopts a broader perspective.”
Numerous studies have highlighted the adverse impacts that introduced plants can have on local ecosystems. In their new environments, these species often thrive without the natural predators and diseases that kept them in check, allowing them to outcompete native flora. They can alter soil pH levels, disrupt nutrient exchange through underground fungal networks, and reshape local animal behaviors and migration patterns.
However, the overarching question remains: how do these various alterations collectively influence the diversity of native plant species?
To address this, the study’s authors conducted a thorough analysis of biological diversity over time, tracking the effects of non-native species as they established themselves in new environments.
The analysis revealed two significant trends. Firstly, the spread of non-native species is increasing rather than slowing down. Secondly, the presence of these species correlates with a diminishing number of native species over time.
Furthermore, the diversity of introduced species is also on the rise, potentially due to their affinity for certain growth-friendly environments, such as urban areas where they are often planted for decorative purposes, or due to the introduction of one non-native species facilitating the entry of others.
As lead author Yunpeng Liu, a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Florida’s Invasion Science Institute, noted, “We still lack clarity on the mechanisms driving this increase.”
Future research is necessary to unravel these complexities. While substantial progress has been made in understanding how introduced trees impact native species, the challenge of addressing the issues remains daunting. As the authors point out, the focus on managing introduced species has shifted largely towards prevention and mitigation, as reversing the damage is often unfeasible once non-native species have become well established.
“Eradicating species once they’re widespread is nearly impossible,” Liu added.
Nevertheless, studies like this are critical, as recognizing a problem is the first step towards finding a solution. The long-term datasets provided by the USDA’s Forest Inventory and Analysis Program offer essential insights and directional strategies for those engaged in ecological restoration. Efforts to remove invasive species and restore native habitats, such as those undertaken by co-authors Pam and Doug Soltis at a protected area of forest at the University of Florida, rely on knowledge of where to concentrate their restoration efforts.
“We can produce a risk map,” Yunpeng said. “This will guide conservation efforts to identify which ecosystems may require more attention in the future.”
Highlighting a Case Study: The Tallow Tree
The tallow tree (Triadica sebifera) is noteworthy for its distinctive spade-shaped leaves, which throughout the seasons exhibit vivid hues—from crimson in spring to rich bronze and yellow shades in autumn. Flowering in long racemes, it produces seeds encased in a thick, waxy layer of tallow, which is valuable for crafting candles and soaps.
Growing to heights of up to 50 feet, this species has a graceful appearance thanks to its sprawling canopy. Native to Asia, the tallow tree has been cultivated there for centuries and was introduced to North America due to its appealing attributes. Benjamin Franklin famously sent tallow tree seeds to the United States in the late 18th century, declaring it “a most useful plant.”
After their introduction, tallow trees thrived in the U.S., rapidly outcompeting native species by growing as much as 13 feet annually. They adapt well to various environments, from flood plains to dry uplands, leading to their wide distribution.
Today, the tallow tree is recognized as one of the most invasive species in the U.S., dominating coastal areas stretching from North Carolina to Texas, with also established populations in California. Its spread was initially encouraged by USDA programs aimed at developing a local soap industry; however, local nurseries continued to promote its growth as an ornamental species long after those incentives diminished.
The tallow tree’s adaptability allows birds to consume its fruit and disperse its seeds, enabling it to spread rapidly into natural habitats, where it disrupts existing ecosystems.
An illustrative case comes from Southeast Texas, where tallow trees, introduced in the early 1800s, initially colonized riparian areas before ascending into higher ground by the late 20th century. The region, once dominated by prairies, has seen significant transformation as tracts of land have been overtaken by tallow tree woodlands.
While tallow trees appear resilient, their environmental impact is becoming clearer. Their leaves, which decompose quickly in aquatic environments, can severely reduce oxygen levels in water bodies, negatively affecting aquatic life, such as Southern leopard frogs and gray tree frogs.
This ecological displacement extends to ground-nesting birds like the federally endangered Attwater’s prairie-chicken, which are losing their habitats as non-native species encroach.
The findings of this study were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Co-authors of the study also include Samuel Scheiner, Aaron Hogan from the USDA Forest Service, Matthew Thomas, Jeremy Lichstein from the University of Florida, and Robert Guralnick from the Florida Museum. Funding for this pivotal research was provided by the National Science Foundation, the USDA Forest Service, and the University of Florida.
Source
www.sciencedaily.com