Photo credit: www.smithsonianmag.com

New Insights into the Purpose of Stonehenge: Unifying Ancient Britain

Situated on Salisbury Plain in southern England, Stonehenge stands as a testament to the architectural and cultural ingenuity of prehistoric societies. This remarkable circle of massive stones, believed to have been constructed around 5,000 years ago, showcases the Neolithic people’s determination to create a monument that would have significant meaning over time.

Emerging research indicates that the bluestones used in Stonehenge were sourced from roughly 140 miles away in western Wales, while the larger sarsen stones were transported from a location just 15 miles north of the site. The monument’s central Altar Stone, weighing 13,200 pounds, is thought to have originated from as far as Scotland, highlighting the extraordinary logistics involved in its construction.

Archaeologists are now reconsidering Stonehenge’s original purpose based on its diverse components. A study that will be published in the journal Archaeology International posits that the site may have served as a unifying symbol for the various communities inhabiting ancient Britain.

Lead author, Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist at University College London, suggests that the unique origins of the stones imply a dual significance for the monument. “The fact that all of [Stonehenge’s] stones originated from distant regions, making it unique among over 900 stone circles in Britain, suggests that the stone circle may have had a political as well as a religious purpose,” he states, emphasizing its role as a marker of unity among disparate groups.

Construction Phases and Cultural Impact

The construction of Stonehenge occurred in several phases, initially featuring the placement of the bluestones around 2900 B.C.E., followed by the addition of the sarsen stones approximately 400 years later. Significant alterations took place between 2500 and 2020 B.C.E., when builders expanded the monument with a large outer circle of sarsen stones and an inner horseshoe of trilithons (pairs of vertical stones capped by horizontal lintels).

Current understanding indicates that the Altar Stone was ingeniously integrated into this framework during the rebuilding phase, serving as a focal point within the inner horseshoe. Its current horizontal position—partly obscured by another stone—has led researchers to explore its historical significance further. Parker Pearson points to similar circular monuments in northeastern Scotland, which were intentionally laid flat, suggesting the Altar Stone may have originally been crafted for that purpose.

The Role of Salisbury Plain

Stonehenge’s location on the expansive Salisbury Plain likely held vital importance for both the local population and broader communities across Britain. “Ancient peoples brought massive monoliths across sometimes hundreds of miles to this one location, which indicates its significance,” Parker Pearson explains. This effort may correlate with a significant phase of immigration from continental Europe, infusing diverse cultural elements into the existing British populations.

During this period of contact with newcomers, Parker Pearson theorizes that the construction of Stonehenge could represent an effort to unify Indigenous Britons with the new arrivals. “There’s obviously some kind of interaction—you might call it ‘first contact’ [with immigrants],” he states, proposing that this integration effort may have catalyzed the impressive expansion of Stonehenge.

Conclusion: A Growing Understanding of Stonehenge’s Legacy

The sheer scale of moving these enormous stones in Neolithic Britain signifies a remarkable collective effort. The absence of advanced technology, such as the wheel, meant that the construction process would have required the cooperation of hundreds, if not thousands, of individuals, embodying the communal spirit of ancient Britons.

Recent geological studies have further refined our understanding of the Altar Stone’s origins, narrowing the possibilities but also bolstering the narrative that these stones were not randomly selected; they were carefully chosen for their cultural resonance.

As archaeological inquiry continues to advance, the prevailing narrative surrounding Stonehenge evolves. Parker Pearson reflects on the insights gained: “The similarities in architecture and material culture between the Stonehenge area and northern Scotland now make more sense. … These distant places had more in common than we might have once thought.” This perspective not only deepens our appreciation for the complexity of Stonehenge but also serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of ancient communities.

Source
www.smithsonianmag.com