Photo credit: www.govexec.com
On Wednesday, a federal judge in Maryland announced that he would extend his temporary order which mandates the Trump administration to reinstate 24,000 federal employees who had been terminated during their probationary periods. This extension will allow Judge James Bredar more time to review the case and determine if a longer injunction is warranted as the legal proceedings unfold.
Judge Bredar, serving in the District of Maryland, instructed both the plaintiffs and the government to provide additional details by 10 a.m. Eastern time on Thursday. This information will help him assess whether a preliminary injunction should be issued to halt further dismissals and facilitate the reinstatement of the affected employees. If granted, such an injunction would remain in effect until the case is resolved.
The temporary restraining order, currently affecting these former federal workers, is set to expire Thursday night; however, Bredar indicated he expects to briefly extend it while awaiting new information.
In February, President Donald Trump and White House advisor Elon Musk directed government agencies to initiate firings affecting a significant number of federal employees, particularly those in the early stages of their careers or who had recently received promotions.
The Wednesday session in a Baltimore court revolved around a lawsuit initiated on March 6 by Democratic attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia. The states involved include Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
The attorneys general contend that the mass firings orchestrated by Trump and Musk have negatively impacted states, as the federal government failed to provide the legally mandated notice. This notice is crucial for states to prepare for the potential influx of unemployed residents who may require state assistance.
In light of these concerns, the states have requested that Judge Bredar issue a preliminary injunction to prevent any further workforce reductions, also known as reductions in force (RIFs).
Judicial Caution Regarding Preliminary Injunctions
During the hearing, Judge Bredar posed significant questions to both the state attorneys and representatives from the U.S. Department of Justice. He inquired of Virginia Williamson, the legal counsel for Maryland, why a nationwide injunction should be granted given that the vast majority of states have not joined the lawsuit.
Bredar emphasized the need for a more targeted injunction, urging Williamson to provide additional evidence within 24 hours that substantiates the necessity for a broader approach. He expressed hesitation about issuing a national injunction, stressing the requirement to demonstrate its importance in addressing the harms claimed by the plaintiffs.
In defense of the government, Eric Hamilton argued that the states lack legal standing and characterized their claims as “unusual,” noting that while they assert the need for advance warnings, they are seeking reconnections to government jobs as a remedy.
Responding to Hamilton, Bredar pointed out that reinstating the workers to their previous employment status would negate many of the concerns raised. He remarked, “If there’s no fire, there’s no need for the fire department to respond.”
Hamilton contended that the burdens associated with rehiring thousands of employees far outweighed any financial losses the states might incur due to the firings. In reaction, Bredar countered that the firings were abrupt and significant, emphasizing the incongruity of reversing the responsibilities after the drastic actions had already taken place.
When questioned by Bredar regarding the limitations on rehiring as a potential remedy, Hamilton noted that there is limited precedent for federal courts mandating personnel decisions by federal agencies.
Previous Court Orders on Rehiring
On March 13, Bredar had previously issued a temporary restraining order that resulted in the immediate reinstatement of over 24,000 federal probationary employees across numerous federal departments and agencies.
The agencies impacted by this order included several key sectors such as Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, along with agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Environmental Protection Agency, as outlined in court documents.
Bredar was notably the second federal judge that day to compel the Trump administration to reinstate terminated federal workers.
The government has since appealed both of the judicial rulings to the relevant appellate courts.
As stated in a status report submitted to Bredar on March 17, federal agency representatives outlined the substantial challenges associated with rehiring the dismissed workers. At that time, nearly 19,000 of the 24,418 employees who had been terminated were placed on paid administrative leave instead of being reinstated to active duty.
Details in the required court filings marked a significant moment, as the government disclosed a comprehensive accounting of the federal workforce reductions that took place from February to March.
Updated status reports were submitted on Tuesday, clarifying that many of the dismissed employees remain on paid administrative leave.
Claims of Contempt for Civil Service
In their initial complaint, the attorneys general accused Trump and his administration of openly displaying a disregard for the approximately 2 million federal civil service professionals, and for their stated intentions to terminate a large number of these personnel, focusing initially on those in probationary status.
The attorneys general claimed that the terminations have thrown various communities nationwide into disarray and will result in substantial financial losses for states due to diminished tax revenue and strain on social services intended for unemployed residents.
These costs are linked to necessary programs that assist with vital services such as health care and food availability, they asserted.
The government has responded by asserting that the 19 states and the District of Columbia lack standing in the case and cannot demonstrate that they have suffered irreparable harm. They further argue that the executive branch is well within its rights to dismiss federal probationary employees.
The government emphasized that any legal action by the states to interject themselves into the employment relationship between the federal government and its employees contradicts the comprehensive statutory framework that governs personnel actions.
Judge Bredar, appointed to the bench in 2010 by President Barack Obama, has a diverse background that includes roles as a National Park Service ranger and various legal positions in Colorado. He briefly served as a federal public defender before being appointed as a magistrate judge.
Source
www.govexec.com