Photo credit: www.cbsnews.com
The former chief vaccines official at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expressed serious concerns regarding Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s remarks about the fatalities of unvaccinated children from measles, particularly in light of the alarming outbreak of the virus this year.
Dr. Peter Marks criticized Kennedy’s perspective, stating, “To trivialize children dying from infectious diseases that we can prevent with vaccines is utterly unacceptable.” His comments were made during an interview on “Face the Nation” that aired on Sunday.
The number of measles cases in the United States has surged to levels not seen since a severe outbreak in 2019, which was the most serious in decades. Tragically, three fatalities associated with the current outbreak have been recorded, including two unvaccinated children in Texas.
In response to the situation, Kennedy made comments during a White House Cabinet meeting, pointing out that there have been only three measles-related deaths in the country over the last two decades. He urged the media to shift its focus to the more chronic health crisis facing the nation.
Kennedy further compared the measles situation in the U.S. with Europe, where recent months have seen significantly higher infection rates and several deaths. This comparison has been leveraged by Kennedy to suggest that his handling of the outbreak was effective.
Dr. Marks countered Kennedy’s assessment, clarifying that Europe’s figures include countries with less developed public health systems, such as Romania and Uzbekistan. He emphasized that even one death from measles in the U.S. remains completely unacceptable. “We ought to reflect on our historical efforts in measles control, particularly prior to the 2019 outbreak, and recognize that we should not be experiencing any measles deaths,” he stated.
Recent Developments at the FDA
Dr. Marks, who was dismissed from his role as director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research by Kennedy’s aides, had previously been instrumental in the Operation Warp Speed initiative, which accelerated COVID-19 vaccine production during the pandemic.
He noted that current challenges faced by some of his former colleagues in the federal government make it difficult for them to advocate for vaccines openly. “There are many who wish they could voice their views about vaccines but feel constrained,” he explained, highlighting the consensus that the benefits of vaccination significantly outweigh the risks.
Following Dr. Marks’s resignation, Kennedy initiated extensive layoffs and resignations within the FDA as part of a broader reorganization of health agencies. These cuts have left federal health officials in difficult positions, grappling with how to manage limited resources for food and drug safety inspections. Marks commended the dedication of the remaining staff, describing them as “heroes in public health” who are persevering under pressure.
He expressed concern about the delayed approval of Novavax’s COVID-19 vaccine, which was expected to be authorized earlier, and cautioned that his removal could indicate a shift in the FDA’s approach to vaccine policy. “Why would you choose to underprioritize something that is fundamentally crucial to public health?” he questioned.
Concerns Over Vaccine Controversies
Dr. Marks revealed he had not directly engaged with Kennedy during his tenure as secretary, nor was he familiar with the administration’s initiatives to reconsider debunked theories linking vaccines to autism. In response to Kennedy’s assertion that environmental toxins were responsible for autism, Marks remarked on the rarity of scientists making absolute claims. He criticized Kennedy’s long-standing accusations linking vaccines to autism as being unfounded and potentially harmful.
“Most scientific discussions are nuanced, with shades of grey, and are not simply black or white. Conversely, pseudoscientists often simplify matters into absolute terms for their personal gain,” he said.
Marks also referenced the controversial past of Dr. Mark Geier and his son, who have been tasked by Kennedy to revisit prior research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regarding vaccines and autism. He expressed skepticism about the motivations behind their persistent claims that vaccines are a cause of autism.
Dr. Marks labeled their work as “pseudo-science,” adding that it undermines genuine scientific inquiry. He mentioned that David Geier had previously faced disciplinary action for practicing medicine illegally, which further complicates this discourse. “I struggle to understand the rationale behind such actions, particularly in a medical context,” he concluded.
Source
www.cbsnews.com