Photo credit: www.businessinsider.com

Explosive Incident Outside Trump Hotel Raises Concerns Over Execution and Design

In an analysis following the explosion outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, experts have indicated that the explosives used in the incident were not sophisticated, suggesting a lack of proper planning and intent to cause maximum damage. The driver involved, an active-duty Army service member, reportedly exhibited poor execution in his attempts.

The vehicle used, a Tesla Cybertruck, had been packed with gasoline tanks, camping fuel, and large firework mortars. The explosion resulted in injuries to at least seven individuals. Just moments before the blast, the driver, identified as Matthew Alan Livelsberger, took his own life.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, responded to the incident by emphasizing the Cybertruck’s design, suggesting it played a role in minimizing the damage caused by the explosion.

Nick Glumac, a mechanical engineering professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, noted that the explosion’s volume indicated a poorly coordinated attempt, stating that if the goal were significant destruction, the execution fell short. He remarked, “It would be very difficult to get the types of fuels here to make into a large scale destruction kind of event.”

When comparing the incident to previous bombings, Glumac referred to the meticulous planning seen during events like the Oklahoma City Bombing, where the explosive setup was significantly more lethal and effective in achieving the attacker’s goals. In contrast, the explosion involving the Cybertruck appeared haphazard and makeshift.

‘The level of sophistication is not what we would expect from an individual with this type of military experience’

Livelsberger was deployed at least three times during his military service, where vehicle bombings were a common tactic. These incidents typically involved vehicles packed with enough explosives to target fortified locations effectively. Recent conflicts, such as in Ukraine, further demonstrate the potential of vehicles as offensive weapons.

During a press briefing, authorities observed the nature of the materials involved in the incident. Kenny Cooper, an assistant special agent in charge for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, emphasized that the sophistication of the methods used did not align with Livelsberger’s military background.

Experts suggested errors in the explosion’s timing might have mitigated its impact. Ali Rangwala, a fire protection engineering professor, theorized that some explosives may not have triggered simultaneously, leading to a less severe explosion than intended.

Jim Wesevich, a forensics expert, elaborated on the mechanics of explosive detonations, explaining that an instantaneous energy release is achieved through a precise ignition of the materials involved. In this instance, it appeared that Livelsberger lacked the expertise to manage this effectively.

Despite Livelsberger’s role within the 10th Special Forces Group, referred to as an operations sergeant, officials noted that he was not classified as a bomb maker. They further indicated that the materials found at the scene included consumer-grade products readily available to the public.

Experts say a vehicle’s design may shape the trajectory of a blast

In response to the explosion, Musk pointed out that the Cybertruck’s unique design features could have contributed to limiting the extent of the damage. Kevin McMahill, sheriff of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, echoed this sentiment, indicating that the vehicle’s structure helped channel the blast upward, reducing the impact on surrounding areas.

Rangwala noted the importance of the Cybertruck’s design, particularly its large glass roof, which might have allowed pressure from the explosion to escape more efficiently. Without such design features, the blast could have been felt more intensely in all directions.

Experts from various fields expressed that traditional pickup trucks would likely have produced similar outcomes in such scenarios, indicating widespread recognition of the Cybertruck’s design advantages in this case. Michael Villahermosa, a former Army commander experienced in explosives disposal, remarked that the incident illustrated not just the properties of the Cybertruck, but more significantly, the inadequacies of the explosive device itself.

Staff writer Ryan Pickrell contributed to this report.

Source
www.businessinsider.com