Photo credit: www.bbc.com
Former Conservative Party leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith has raised concerns regarding potential Chinese espionage in the United Kingdom, suggesting that the Chinese businessman barred from the UK might represent just a fraction of a larger spy network operating openly in the country.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Sir Iain indicated that the alleged spy could be “the tip of the iceberg” among other similar individuals who may be engaging in espionage activities within the UK. His remarks come amidst ongoing scrutiny of China’s influence on British affairs, as he seeks to present an urgent question in the House of Commons regarding this issue.
The individual in question, referred to as H6 due to a judicial mandate protecting his identity, was prohibited from entering the UK last week by a national security court. During the court proceedings, it was revealed that he had cultivated an “unusual degree of trust” with Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.
Former security minister Tom Tugendhat emphasized the seriousness of the situation, stating it highlights “the level of threat” posed by China to British sovereignty. Political discussions have centered around the United Front Work Department, a Chinese Communist Party entity believed to be involved with H6, which conducts operations aimed at influencing global policies.
Tugendhat elaborated on the broader implications of such influence, noting that the Chinese government is not only attempting to sway individual opinions within the royal family but also targeting sectors across academia, politics, business, and media. He described these efforts as a fundamental strategy for the Chinese Communist Party to exert its influence in the UK.
Amidst these revelations, Prince Andrew has publicly stated that he has “ceased all contact” with H6 and asserted that any previous meetings were conducted through formal channels, with “nothing of a sensitive nature ever discussed.” This came after H6 reportedly attended the prince’s birthday celebration in 2020 and was informed that he could represent Andrew during discussions with potential Chinese investors.
Confidential correspondence discovered on H6’s seized electronic devices indicated that an advisor to Prince Andrew had suggested that H6 was able to facilitate discreet access for certain individuals to the prince’s residence in Windsor, raising questions about the nature of their relationship and H6’s intentions.
This situation adds to the controversies surrounding Prince Andrew, who is already distanced from royal duties. Recent financial scrutiny indicated that King Charles had withdrawn financial support for Andrew, further complicating his status.
As the holiday season approaches, reports suggest that Prince Andrew may be advised to maintain a lower profile during traditional royal activities, as there are concerns that his presence could divert attention from the family during public events.
In the broader context of national security, H6’s case has implications that extend beyond individual actions. The alleged Chinese spy was previously intercepted by UK border police in November 2021, where he surrendered several electronic devices. The then Home Secretary Suella Braverman imposed a ban on H6’s entry into the UK in March 2023—a decision later upheld by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, which reviews such national security cases.
Throughout his engagements in the UK, H6 reportedly met influential figures, including former Prime Ministers David Cameron and Theresa May, in addition to Prince Andrew, who referred to him as a “close confidant.” Sir Iain asserts that the prominence of H6’s contacts underscores a troubling reality: that China’s extensive financial resources are being utilized to build connections with key legislators and influencers, often in plain sight.
While the courts have imposed anonymity on H6, prompting frustration among some politicians, there are suggestions that parliamentary privilege may allow certain members of parliament to reveal the spy’s identity without legal repercussions. However, others advocate that naming H6 should remain within the judicial purview.
Source
www.bbc.com