Photo credit: www.cnbc.com
Dockworkers’ Union and Port Owners Meet to Discuss Automation Challenges
A crucial meeting involving prominent representatives from the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) took place on Sunday, aimed at resolving the contentious issue regarding automation in ports. The discussions centered around establishing a framework for integrating new technologies while simultaneously creating job opportunities for human workers.
According to sources familiar with the meeting details, the eight-hour session was conducted in anticipation of resuming formal negotiations, with a looming deadline of January 15 to avert a potential strike by dockworkers. Recent breakdowns in discussions had primarily stemmed from disagreements over automation. As a result, new language regarding the role of automation in the workplace was drafted to aid the upcoming review process scheduled for Tuesday.
However, insiders caution that these new proposals may raise concerns about increased labor costs, complicating the likelihood of reaching a comprehensive agreement on wages and automation practices.
The meeting brought together stakeholders from port terminals already utilizing advanced technology, such as rail-mounted gantry (RMG) cranes at terminals in Bayonne, New Jersey, and Virginia. Key executives participating included Paul Demaria from USMX, Kevin Price of Gateway Terminals, and other prominent figures from the port operations sector. The ILA was represented by President Harold Daggett and other union officials.
Documentation reviewed revealed that the ILA has maintained the right to enhance its workforce in response to any technological advancements, emphasizing a commitment to exploring all technologies that can increase operational efficiency. It outlined that skilled human crane operators are effectively working alongside modern crane control systems, enabling them to perform tasks requiring high precision.
The document described various operations, from semi-automated tasks where machines handle repetitive actions to fully manual operations where union labor manages all processes without automation assistance. Technologies such as loading positioning sensors and obstacle detection systems have been credited with helping human operators achieve levels of accuracy comparable to automated systems.
Despite the willingness of USMX to address some union concerns, there remain critical issues unresolved. USMX representatives have expressed worries that new labor costs might not reflect operational realities, potentially affecting the entire supply chain and ultimately consumers.
A terminal operator raised questions regarding the necessity of certain positions, stating, “What are deemed as necessary jobs? Is the job truly needed, or is it merely being created to justify hiring?” This perspective highlights the concern that added labor could drive service costs upward, ultimately leading to increased prices for consumers.
The ILA, meanwhile, opted not to provide comments following the meeting. The path forward remains uncertain as the full USMX bargaining team deliberates on the proposed language concerning automation. Sources indicate that failure to reach a consensus might trigger another strike.
A sense of urgency surrounding the negotiations was echoed by a USMX member who remarked, “We are at an inflection point. If a strike occurs, it could lead to unpredictable outcomes, possibly invoking government intervention.”
President-elect Donald Trump has publicly affirmed his support for the union’s stance on automation, potentially adding pressure to the negotiations. If the USMX accepts the proposed terms linking automation to job creation, the previously agreed 62% wage increase could be jeopardized, as the cost impacts of automation could hinder the ability to finance such increases.
The working document emphasizes that if consensus on the use of “Operator Assisted Technology” cannot be achieved, the issue will proceed to a technology committee process, which includes both union and port representatives. This committee serves as the final step before arbitration, if deemed necessary.
While the potential hiring tied to technological advancements would rely on agreements within local union chapters, any final decision would ultimately require approval from the ILA’s national leadership. Observers note that the Daggett family retains significant influence over these decisions, affecting how many individuals are hired and who receives substantial compensation.
Source
www.cnbc.com