Photo credit: www.businessinsider.com

New York Times vs. OpenAI: Ongoing Copyright Dispute

The New York Times has initiated legal action against OpenAI, claiming that the tech company utilized its articles without authorization to train the AI model ChatGPT. This lawsuit, filed in December, is among a wave of copyright infringement cases directed at OpenAI from various media organizations.

Details of the Legal Proceedings

The litigation has moved into the discovery phase, which is crucial for both parties to collect and exchange evidence in preparation for trial. OpenAI’s legal team sought details regarding the Times’ use of generative AI, encompassing both external AI tools and any proprietary tools being developed for journalistic purposes, as well as the organization’s perspectives on the technology.

However, Judge Ona T. Wang invalidated this request during a hearing, deeming the information irrelevant to the case. To clarify her decision, she provided an analogy likening OpenAI’s situation to that of a video game developer facing a copyright infringement claim. In such cases, while a copyright holder may have to disclose information about their interactions with the game manufacturer, the manufacturer cannot request extensive details about the copyright holder’s broader gaming practices or internal discussions.

Additional Revelations and Developments

Recent legal documents disclosed that OpenAI’s engineers inadvertently deleted certain evidence that was crucial for the Times’ lawyers during their extensive investigation into potential copyright violations. The legal team for the Times reportedly invested over 150 hours reviewing OpenAI’s training datasets for instances of infringement. Although most of the erased data has been successfully retrieved, the Times’ representatives asserted that there was no indication that the deletion was done with intent.

Broader Context of Copyright Cases Against OpenAI

This lawsuit is just one of many copyright actions against OpenAI, with similar cases filed by other media entities, such as the New York Daily News and The Intercept. A few lawsuits have already been thrown out by the courts, including those from Raw Story and AlterNet, which failed to prove significant harm resulting from OpenAI’s practices.

Authors Join the Legal Fray

OpenAI also faces legal challenges from a coalition of authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman, who claim that the company has unlawfully incorporated their books into the training set for ChatGPT. In a complaint raised in 2023, the plaintiffs accused OpenAI of utilizing their works without consent, credit, or financial recompense.

The complaint articulates that a substantial portion of the data used to train OpenAI’s models consists of copyrighted materials, including those authored by the plaintiffs. OpenAI asserts on its website that its models are developed using publicly available information, data obtained from third-party partnerships, and user-generated content.

Challenges Ahead for Authors

During a discussion on Rob Lowe’s SiriusXM podcast, Silverman addressed the complexities of the ongoing legal battle, expressing concerns about the challenges posed by confronting a corporation with substantial financial resources. She remarked, “They are the richest entities in the world, and we live in a country where that’s considered a person that can influence, practically create policy, let alone influence it.”

In contrast, some media organizations have opted to collaborate with OpenAI, entering licensing agreements worth significant sums, like those from Axel Springer, which owns Business Insider. Such partnerships illustrate the fragmented landscape where different entities navigate the evolving dynamics of AI and copyright law.

As the legal proceedings continue, the work of the Times and other organizations exemplifies the increasing scrutiny tech companies face regarding the ethical use of copyrighted materials in the development of artificial intelligence.

Both OpenAI and the New York Times refrained from providing comments when approached for further information concerning the ongoing litigation.

Source
www.businessinsider.com