Photo credit: www.foxnews.com
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Sanctuary City Funding Cuts
A federal judge appointed by former President Obama has ruled against the Trump administration’s attempts to cut funding to sanctuary cities, citing concerns over constitutionality and separation of powers. Judge William Orrick, serving in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, issued the ruling on Thursday, asserting that the executive orders targeted at these municipalities were unconstitutional.
Orrick’s decision responds to President Trump’s executive directives aimed at withholding federal funds from cities and counties that do not adhere to federal immigration enforcement. According to the ruling, these orders violate key constitutional principles, specifically the Spending Clause and the Fifth and Tenth Amendments, as well as due process rights.
TRUMP CRITICIZES COURT INTERVENTION IN IMMIGRATION POLICY
The judge characterized Trump’s orders — which were dubbed “Protecting the American People Against Invasion” and “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders” — as “unconstitutionally vague” and coercive. Orrick emphasized that such threats to withhold funding could cause “irreparable injury” by creating financial uncertainty and damaging the trust between local governments and the communities they serve.
Documents from the Federal Election Commission reveal that Orrick has a significant history of financial contributions to the Democratic Party, donating over $113,600 to various candidates and committees since his nomination in 2012. Prominent recipients of his contributions include Barack Obama, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and Dianne Feinstein.
In his contributions, Orrick notably donated $2,300 and $28,500 to the Obama Victory Fund in 2008 and has provided $53,500 to the Democratic National Committee. His political involvement extends beyond financial contributions; he served as a co-chair for efforts to elect John Kerry in the early 2000s and played a similar role for Barack Obama in 2006-2008. Additionally, he has campaigned for candidates such as Kamala Harris, introducing her at a fundraiser in San Francisco in 2009.
Impact of the Ruling
Supporters of sanctuary cities hailed the ruling as a victory for local governance and community trust. Critics, including President Trump, have condemned what they perceive as judicial overreach that obstructs immigration policy enforcement. This ruling amplifies the ongoing national debate surrounding immigration, federal authority, and the rights of local governments.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, this case highlights the complexities at the intersection of law, policy, and political affiliation, underscoring how judicial rulings can have far-reaching impacts on both local communities and national governance.
Source
www.foxnews.com