Photo credit: www.theguardian.com
In a recent development, the UK government is facing significant pressure regarding proposed changes to disability benefits, specifically concerning the personal independence payment (PIP). Reports indicate that a potential freeze on these benefits could lead to resignations among frontbench ministers and parliamentary aides if the government proceeds with such plans, which would necessitate parliamentary voting.
Labour MPs have expressed their alarm over the government’s unwillingness, both privately and publicly, to categorically safeguard benefits for the most vulnerable disabled individuals who cannot work. Although Downing Street has assured the public of its intent to “protect those who cannot work,” it has refrained from committing to ensuring that all affected individuals will remain untouched by the proposed changes. Sources reveal that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has been attempting to ease concerns among MPs regarding these issues.
Newly elected MPs have conveyed skepticism over the viability of freezing the PIP, citing the anticipated backlash as a major deterrent for the government. During a recent meeting facilitated by Keir Starmer’s political director and economic adviser in Downing Street, MPs were informed that their concerns were acknowledged. However, the lack of specifics regarding the proposed amendments seemed to exacerbate anxieties among those present.
A number of MPs voiced their apprehensions, noting that the repercussions of a PIP freeze could be far-reaching, potentially igniting a rebellion in Parliament. During these discussions, senior government ministers reportedly shared their worries about the power of dissent within party ranks, including key figures such as Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Labour leaders Ed Miliband and Lucy Powell.
During the tense meeting, ministers raised concerns about how proposed spending cuts might adversely affect public services and the responsibilities of their respective departments. Their spokespersons, however, chose not to comment on the ongoing discussions.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves defended the government’s direction on welfare system reform, asserting that the current framework fails to effectively assist individuals in need or to encourage employment, ultimately placing a heavier burden on taxpayers. She emphasized the necessity for reform to allocate more resources toward national defense while addressing public service inefficiencies.
The two primary issues stirring anxiety among MPs revolve around the PIP freeze and alterations to eligibility criteria, alongside a potential reduction in universal credit for those unable to work. Notably, this could disproportionately impact individuals dealing with mental health issues and long-term ailments. One MP highlighted the discomfort surrounding blanket cuts, emphasizing the potential negative implications for those suffering from conditions such as multiple sclerosis and dementia.
Another MP remarked on the desire among various factions of the parliamentary party to unite against the proposed changes. The likelihood of ministerial resignations appears greatest concerning the PIP freeze due to its requirement for primary legislation, with more junior ministers potentially considering their positions.
skip past newsletter promotion
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
A green paper detailing the proposed welfare changes is expected to be released next week, a schedule adjustment from an earlier date as officials finalize the details. Ministers have until March 21 to submit their proposals to the Office for Budget Responsibility ahead of the Chancellor’s spring statement, though many anticipated changes may not yield immediate savings.
Kendall has already secured £1 billion aimed at helping individuals return to work, with hopes among MPs for further protections. However, one MP noted a disconnect between the purported moral motivations for reform and the rushed nature of the decision-making process, suggesting these factors could undermine the perceived moral case for changes.
A government insider commented that while the primary components of the proposal are unlikely to shift, minor adjustments may occur. Certain Labour MPs who participated in discussions at Downing Street felt that the government was receptive to their concerns. They stressed the importance of providing adequate support to ensure individuals can transition into employment.
In response to queries regarding cabinet objections to the proposed cuts, a spokesperson for Starmer refrained from providing specifics but defended the overall strategy, emphasizing the necessity for a sustainable welfare system that encourages employment while also protecting those unable to work, in order to foster economic growth.
Source
www.theguardian.com