Photo credit: www.theguardian.com

NATO’s Baltic Sentry: Safeguarding Undersea Infrastructure Amid Rising Tensions

A NATO task force, described as the “security camera of the Baltic,” has congregated off the Estonian coast in a concerted effort to safeguard critical undersea cables and pipelines from potential sabotage.

This deployment includes a Dutch frigate, a naval research vessel, and a German minesweeper, which have recently arrived in Tallinn, shrouded in January fog. A French minesweeper is expected to join, and additional NATO ships are en route, supporting the Baltic Sentry initiative established at a recent summit in Helsinki.

Cmdr. Erik Kockx, commander of the Belgian mine countermeasures task force involved in Baltic Sentry, stated, “The group will grow in the near future, with other ships joining us, so in the end, we will be about six or seven ships,” emphasizing the increased maritime presence in the region.

“We will function as the security cameras of the Baltic Sea, monitoring any actions against our critical underwater infrastructure, ensuring we can respond appropriately,” Kockx added.

This heightened vigilance follows a troubling incident on Christmas Day when the Estlink 2 power cable connecting Finland and Estonia, along with four data cables, suffered damage. Finnish authorities reported that the vessel Eagle S, an oil tanker, inadvertently dragged its anchor across the seabed for 60 miles, subsequently entangling the cables.

Following the incident, the Eagle S was escorted into Finnish waters, where it was boarded by a specialized police unit. Currently, the ship is detained near Porvoo, Sweden, with nine crew members barred from leaving Finland as investigations proceed.

The circumstances surrounding the Eagle S raise significant concerns within a context marked by hybrid warfare, blurring the lines between unintentional mishaps and deliberate disruptions. This 74,000-tonne tanker, previously known by different names and flagged under the Cook Islands, is owned by a Dubai-based corporation but crewed primarily by Georgians and Indians. It was reportedly transporting 35,000 tonnes of petrol from the Russian port of Ust-Luga to Turkey when the incident occurred.

NATO and Finnish officials speculate that the ship may be part of Russia’s expansive “shadow fleet,” which operates through various global vessels to bypass sanctions following the Ukraine invasion. Finnish law enforcement theorizes that such ships, which break sanctions, could also be repurposed for acts of sabotage.

The vessel’s owner, Caravella, has publicly denied any wrongdoing and contested the ship’s detention. Legal representatives have claimed that the authorities lacked the jurisdiction for such an action, labeling the boarding an illegal seizure.

Adding to the complexity of the situation, the Eagle S was implicated in another questionable event off the Dutch coast, where it reportedly drifted over the Atlantic Crossing 1 telecommunications cable. There were allegations that it was found carrying surveillance equipment, although Finnish inspectors reported no unusual findings during the vessel’s boarding.

The incident involving the Eagle S marks the third in a series of troubling events affecting critical undersea infrastructure in the Baltic region. In October, damage to the Balticconnector gas pipeline was attributed to the anchor of a Hong Kong-flagged vessel, with China admitting its responsibility but asserting it was accidental. Similarly, a bulk carrier was blamed for dragging its anchor across multiple fiber-optic cables in November, yet faced limited scrutiny from Chinese authorities.

According to Tomas Jermalavičius, head of studies at the International Centre for Defence and Security in Tallinn, this sequence of incidents reflects an unusual frequency concerning vital strategic infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. “We have not witnessed such a series of episodes related to important undersea operations,” he noted.

Despite the Estlink 2 rupture not immediately disrupting power supplies, the ongoing repairs promise to stretch for months, leaving the region’s energy grid more vulnerable during this period. This incident emerges against a backdrop of escalating tensions as Baltic nations prepare to fully decouple their energy systems from Russian control by synchronizing with the European grid in early February.

Noting the stakes involved, Jermalavičius warned that Moscow might attempt to influence this transition, potentially seeking to generate chaos or discredit Baltic governance. “The threat of power outages looms large,” he added.

Commodore Arjen Warnaar, leading the NATO marine group tasked with protecting the underwater assets, shared his concerns about the Estlink 2 situation. While acknowledging that investigations are ongoing, he did not shy away from suggesting the potential involvement of external actors.

During the Helsinki summit, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte referred to recent incidents as “possible sabotage” and stressed the importance of fortifying undersea communication and energy networks. He highlighted the vast network of undersea cables that handle significant daily financial transactions and emphasized that ship captains must be aware of potential repercussions for threats against this infrastructure.

NATO’s enhanced maritime presence will leverage a wide array of intelligence resources, including aerial surveillance, underwater sonar technologies, and drone systems capable of detecting any suspicious activity. Kockx affirmed that vessels departing from Russian ports are now subject to vigilant observation, which is expected to deter any unlawful actions.

Source
www.theguardian.com