Photo credit: www.foxnews.com
New Jersey Mayor Proposes Reverse Congestion Pricing Following NYC Toll Implementation
A mayor in New Jersey is advocating for a reverse congestion pricing toll in response to the recent implementation of a similar toll in New York City. This unconventional approach was suggested by Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, who is also a candidate in the state’s gubernatorial race.
Fulop’s proposal emerges after New York City enacted a congestion pricing toll designed to reduce traffic by charging vehicles entering congested areas of Manhattan. “New Jersey has the same opportunity to push back against what New York is doing to us,” Fulop remarked, emphasizing that the intention is not just a retaliatory measure but a call for collaboration to find a reasonable solution.
Understanding Reverse Congestion Pricing
According to Fulop, implementing reverse congestion pricing is a strategic response to the toll imposed by New York City. This initiative would impose fees on vehicles entering New Jersey from the busy New York crossings, potentially shaping traffic patterns and encouraging public transportation use.
“There are numerous crossings between Staten Island, New York, and various counties in New Jersey,” Fulop noted, suggesting these crossings could serve as ideal points for implementing a similar impact fee as New York’s toll. He expressed the view that the revenue generated from this reverse toll could significantly benefit New Jersey’s ailing mass transit system, which has experienced numerous delays and service interruptions.
Investing in Mass Transit
Fulop criticized the current state of New Jersey Transit, labeling it as inadequate and in dire need of additional investment. “Until we establish a reliable transportation system, it’s unrealistic to expect people to use the trains,” he stated, arguing that reverse congestion pricing could provide an essential financial boost for improvements.
By leveraging the revenue from this toll, Fulop believes New Jersey could enhance its public transport infrastructure, addressing the systemic shortcomings that have plagued its transit systems for years. He lamented that initial discussions around New Jersey receiving compensation from New York City’s toll collapsed amid ongoing legal disputes, missing a crucial opportunity for funding.
Details and Uncertainties Surrounding the Proposal
While the framework for Fulop’s proposed reverse congestion pricing is still in development, he mentioned that gantries or tolling points could be placed near tunnels and bridges accessing New Jersey. He hinted at the possibility of including exemptions or credits for frequent crossers similar to those found in New York’s congestion pricing model. However, it remains unclear if New Jersey residents would be subjected to tolls upon their return to the state, a feature that has sparked contention for some New Yorkers.
As the conversation around congestion pricing evolves, Mayor Fulop’s initiative adds a new dimension to the dialogue on transportation and traffic management in the region. The potential of reverse congestion pricing not only seeks to mitigate traffic challenges but also aspires to finance necessary improvements in public transit across New Jersey.
Source
www.foxnews.com