Photo credit: www.yahoo.com
In the midst of his legal struggle to regain automatic police protection funded by the state, Prince Harry has revealed his belief that the recent removal of his security was a strategic move to pressure him and his wife, Duchess Meghan, into resuming their royal duties.
Prince Harry left the London court on April 9 feeling disillusioned after two days of largely private hearings at the Royal Courts of Justice. According to reports from The Telegraph and People, he expressed that his “worst fears have been confirmed” as rather sensitive details were uncovered in court. “That’s really sad,” Harry commented regarding the revelations.
Initially, Harry and Meghan aimed to carve out a new life that balanced international residence within the Commonwealth while still representing the monarchy. Harry described this effort as their attempt to cultivate a “happy house,” a plan he conveyed to the late Queen Elizabeth before they departed the UK in 2020.
After deliberating on the Sussexes’ future arrangements in a meeting later referred to as the Sandringham Summit, Harry was under the impression that his security detail funded by taxpayers would remain in effect. Queen Elizabeth had also articulated in a correspondence that ensuring “effective security” for the couple, given the known threats against them, was “of paramount importance.” Yet, shocking news emerged shortly afterward that their security would be rescinded.
Since then, Harry has taken legal action against the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC), the authority responsible for security measures. A considerable portion of his conflict with the royal family emanates from his belief that the withdrawal of his security was a tactic aimed at incentivizing him and Meghan to return to their royal duties by instilling fear around their visits to the UK. The connection between RAVEC’s decision and this perceived pressure tactic has been a difficult reality for Harry to accept.
Harry’s legal representatives have contended that RAVEC’s decision-making process diverged from standard procedures and that he was subjected to “different, unjustified, and inferior treatment.” Furthermore, they highlighted that the rationale for the Sussexes’ security removal does not pertain to other prominent individuals, such as celebrities and former prime ministers.
Addressing the media outside the court, Harry remarked that while he could forgive many incidents from since 2016—the year he met Meghan—he cannot accept any compromises regarding his family’s safety. He alluded to highly confidential evidence revealed in court, stating, “People would be shocked by what’s being withheld.” The stress of this ongoing battle has left him feeling “exhausted and overwhelmed,” yet he remains motivated to combat injustice. When he identifies a wrongdoing, he feels compelled to delve deeper and rectify the situation.
Throughout the years since his exit from senior royal duties, Harry has found himself involved in numerous legal disputes, with various degrees of success. Most notably, he achieved a significant settlement and public acknowledgment from a media outlet regarding phone hacking that targeted his mother, Princess Diana. However, his current fight to reinstate police protection remains the most critical for him personally. “This one has always mattered the most,” Harry emphasized.
You Might Also Like
Source
www.yahoo.com