Photo credit: www.foxnews.com

Trump’s Historic First 100 Days: A Surge in Executive Orders

President Donald Trump has entered the history books during his first 100 days of his second term, eclipsing a significant record set by former President Franklin D. Roosevelt regarding executive orders. As of now, Trump has enacted over 135 executive orders, a marked increase from the 33 issued during his initial 100 days and significantly higher than Roosevelt’s tally of 99.

This extensive use of executive orders raises concerns about a shift in power dynamics, with legislative authority increasingly residing in the executive branch. Experts like James Broughel from the Competitive Enterprise Institute suggest that Trump’s actions indicate a growing trend for future administrations to rely more heavily on executive actions to push through agendas.

Broughel observes, “The current landscape reveals a concentration of power within the executive branch, enabling the president to pursue broad and impactful initiatives through executive measures.” He believes that this pattern may encourage future leaders to follow in Trump’s footsteps.

The Importance of Early Actions

These first 100 days are crucial for laying out a president’s priorities and shaping the narrative surrounding their administration. As Broughel points out, establishing a clear direction early on is essential, as time becomes a limiting factor in implementing significant changes as the term advances.

Moreover, the Trump administration’s approach to this influx of executive orders can be attributed to an extensive period of preparation during his time away from office. Thomas Berry, director at the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies, notes that the administration had ample time to identify specific issues they aimed to address through executive actions.

According to Berry, many of these orders focus on dismantling previous obstacles faced during Trump’s first term. This includes directives aimed at loosening restrictions on firing federal employees.

Challenges Ahead for Executive Actions

However, the longevity of these executive orders is questionable. Berry highlights that such directives can be easily rescinded by succeeding administrations, lacking the permanence of statutory law. He emphasizes a crucial point: “The effectiveness of these executive orders can be severely undermined if they significantly weaken governmental agencies, complicating future rebounds.” For instance, proposed cuts to staffing at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) could hinder its capacity for years to come.

Additionally, Trump’s recent executive actions target dismantling parts of the Education Department, redistributing its functions to other agencies. This aligns with his broader strategy to streamline federal operations.

Judicial Strain from Executive Actions

The rapid enactment of these orders has placed considerable pressure on the judicial system. Over 150 lawsuits have already been launched to contest various executive actions, including contentious issues such as birthright citizenship and restrictions on military service for transgender individuals. Several of these controversies remain in legal limbo.

Berry points out that the sheer volume of litigation complicates the judiciary’s ability to operate effectively. The increased urgency imposed by the administration’s swift actions forces judges to work under tight deadlines, impacting their capacity for thorough deliberation. This cycle can contribute to a perception of judicial variability, particularly when Trump critiques the judiciary for insufficient legal grounding in its rulings.

Looking forward, Berry anticipates a slowdown in the issuance of new executive orders as many initial actions appear to have been pre-planned. He comments, “The administration will likely exhaust its pre-formed agenda by the close of the first year, leaving any remaining orders to be more reactive.”

In summary, while Trump’s first 100 days have indeed set a new benchmark for executive action, the long-term implications of these decisions will shape both policy outcomes and the balance of power in the U.S. government for years to come.

Source
www.foxnews.com