Photo credit: www.sciencedaily.com
New Research Unveils Insights into Dazzle Camouflage’s Effectiveness in World War I
Recent research conducted by Aston University scholars, Professor Tim Meese and Dr. Samantha Strong, has re-evaluated century-old data regarding the effectiveness of ‘dazzle’ camouflage used on battleships during World War I. Their findings suggest that while the dazzle technique had some effectiveness, it pales in comparison to the impact of the ‘horizon effect’ in obscuring enemy ships’ true positions.
Historically, during World War I, naval forces implemented dazzle camouflage—a pattern of geometric shapes and stripes—aimed at bewildering U-boat commanders regarding the speed and trajectory of their vessels to thwart attacks.
The ‘horizon effect’ refers to the optical illusion where a distant ship appears to be moving along the horizon, regardless of its actual course. Ships navigating at angles up to 25° relative to the horizon can create this illusion, making it challenging for observers to accurately gauge their direction. Even vessels at sharper angles often lead to significant underestimations in perceived trajectory distances by onlookers.
Despite the popularity of dazzle camouflage during the war, it wasn’t until 1919 that a systematic study was conducted by Leo Blodgett, a student at MIT. As part of his thesis, Blodgett painted model ships using dazzle patterns and utilized a periscope setup akin to those employed by U-boat operators to analyze how observer judgments deviated from the ships’ real directions.
Professor Meese and Dr. Strong recognized that while Blodgett’s work yielded valuable insights, his experimental design lacked rigor by modern standards. While Blodgett confirmed the effectiveness of dazzle camouflage, the Aston University researchers suspected that other elements contributed to his findings. They meticulously refined the data and initiated new analyses to glean additional understanding.
Dr. Strong, a senior lecturer in the School of Optometry at Aston University, remarked, “Establishing a control condition is crucial for drawing reliable conclusions. Blodgett’s report regarding his control was insufficient. We replicated Blodgett’s experiment using photographs from his thesis, enabling us to compare results of ships with original dazzle paint against those without. Our experiment yielded promising results, demonstrating that while both configurations exhibited the horizon effect, dazzle camouflage introduced an additional layer of visual distortion.”
If errors in the perceived direction of a ship were solely the result of the perspective distortion induced by dazzle painting, logical outcomes would suggest that the bow of the ship would consistently twist away from its actual course. However, the findings from Professor Meese and Dr. Strong revealed that when the actual heading pointed away from the observer, the bow was oftentimes perceived to twist towards them. Their comprehensive analysis underscored a minor influence from the dazzle effect but a dominant one from the horizon illusion, with instances of both effects working against and in concert with one another.
Professor Meese, a vision science expert at the same institution, noted, “We were already familiar with the twist and horizon effects from recent computer-aided research with our colleagues at Abertay University. A notable discovery from our current study is that these two effects emerge in similar ratios among participants experienced in camouflage tactics, including a lieutenant from a European navy. This bolsters our previous conclusions, illustrating that the horizon effect—regardless of dazzle—was not easily recognized even by those knowledgeable in camouflage strategies.”
He added, “This scenario underscores how visual perception can supersede informed knowledge. During the era of dazzle, the horizon effect was not acknowledged, and Blodgett’s results regarding perceptual biases were mistakenly attributed solely to the camouflage, ultimately misleading the very individuals designed to be deceived.”
Looking ahead, both researchers advocate for further investigations to fully grasp how dazzle camouflage may have amplified perceptual uncertainties related to direction and speed, as well as to explore geometric elements related to torpedo targeting tactics that could have offered supportive countermeasures.
Source
www.sciencedaily.com