Photo credit: www.autosport.com
In Bahrain, discussions within the Formula 1 paddock centered around a significant meeting focused on the future engine formula and the regulations set to take effect in 2026. This meeting followed a media session with Nikolas Tombazis in China, where the director of the FIA’s single-seater commission introduced two critical inquiries.
The first question addresses the long-term vision for F1’s engine formula. If the intention is to shift toward a V10 engine powered by sustainable fuels by 2031—possibly even sooner—the follow-up question becomes: what should transpire leading up to that milestone? During the media session, the FIA presented two alternatives: either shorten the cycle of the 2026 regulations or abandon them altogether.
From the ensuing discussions with manufacturers, it became evident that scrapping the current regulations is off the table. Sources indicate that three key manufacturers firmly expressed their opposition to such a move. Audi and Honda have entered (or remained in) F1 specifically due to their interest in electrification and sustainability-oriented regulations. Mercedes also articulated its stance, with Toto Wolff emphasizing the need for F1 to be a “reliable partner.” He reiterated that last-minute regulatory changes would undermine that reliability.
During the meeting, Daimler CEO Ola Kallenius participated virtually and echoed a similar position. With Audi and Honda firmly against the idea of discarding the new regulations, it was swiftly removed from consideration, as a supermajority was necessary for any alterations. The FIA, represented by Tombazis, underscored that any proposed changes must originate from a “broad consensus.”
What Lies Ahead? Engine Technology and Key Issues
Beyond the immediate discussions regarding the 2026 regulations, the meeting also delved into the future characteristics of F1 engines. The FIA clarified its stance, stating that “a degree of electrification will always be part of future considerations.”
Among the proposals frequently discussed is the introduction of a V10 or V8 engine featuring KERS, but practical complexities arise. Some manufacturers perceive this technology as overly heavy, particularly given the increased fuel demands it entails.
Meanwhile, there is a preference among several stakeholders for turbo engines, as Audi argues that this offers greater relevance for technology transfer to road vehicles. Driver Esteban Ocon expressed dissatisfaction with the current engine sound, stating, “It’s not the sound that we loved when we were young… a naturally aspirated engine—be it V6, V8, or even a three-cylinder—would sound great.” He believes the current turbo setup detracts from the sport’s auditory appeal.
The complex landscape suggests that engine discussions will remain a long-term commitment. The FIA has indicated that any future formula post-2031 must strike a balance between sustainability, weight reduction concerning safety, performance relevance to road vehicles, auditory engagement, and fan appeal. The negotiations thus far have highlighted that sustainability and road relevance are paramount for retaining the interest of manufacturers, a sentiment both the FIA and F1 are keen to uphold despite various proclamations about a potential shift to V10 engines.
Avoiding Negative Perceptions Regarding 2026 Regulations
Amid this, another pressing topic surrounds the political implications of the 2026 regulations, with unresolved concerns persisting regarding their overall structure and the quality of racing they may generate. Additionally, there’s anxiety that a single manufacturer could dominate within the new framework.
Driver Carlos Sainz articulated his reservations by stating, “I wouldn’t be too vocal supporting the comeback of a V10 engine if I liked what I saw from 2026… I would say yes—I would like a V10 engine with a few tweaks to make it back sooner rather than later.” However, even if the wish exists, it is unlikely to materialize; Sainz’s viewpoint underscores broader dissatisfaction with the current direction of the 2026 regulations.
This sentiment resonates throughout the paddock, though McLaren team principal Andrea Stela advised caution. “We haven’t even started 2026, and we are already discussing changes,” he noted. “We need to collectively ensure the sport’s interests are protected and avoid undermining potentially successful regulations.” He believes that with cooperation, 2026 can yield a commendable product.
The Political Dimension of Formula 1
Navigating the complex political terrain surrounding the 2026 regulations poses significant challenges. Differing opinions on what constitutes the “interest of the sport” complicate efforts to address concerns related to regulatory impacts on racing dynamics and the potential for one manufacturer to gain a competitive edge.
Steps have been initiated to address imbalances among teams; for instance, the FIA is considering mechanisms that would provide additional opportunities for less competitive teams, moving away from reliance on token systems, instead offering extended testing time and development space within the engine budget cap.
However, the more contentious issue involves potential alterations to the balance of electric and internal combustion power during races, representing a conflict between the broader interests of the sport and the specific agendas of manufacturers. Red Bull has expressed its apprehension about a future scenario where race dynamics might diminish due to the current regulations. Team principal Christian Horner remarked that avoiding excessive “lifting and coasting” is crucial for maintaining the sport’s integrity and enhancing driver engagement.
In contrast, Wolff expressed skepticism about the feasibility of any substantial adjustments before the 2026 rollout, hinting that current discussions might lack urgency. Nonetheless, he underscored a philosophical divide between defending existing frameworks and advocating for more aggressive changes.
As discussions unfold, the fundamental aspect remains that these debates primarily hinge on energy deployment strategies during races rather than hardware modifications. The FIA’s future choices—potentially adjusting the 350kW limit—could reshape the landscape dramatically, meaning future regulations will require careful consideration of all stakeholders’ interests. With the clock ticking toward 2026, the pressing question remains: who will prioritize the fans’ experience over marginal gains for their teams?
Source
www.autosport.com