Photo credit: www.theguardian.com

Political Dynamics Surrounding Keir Starmer’s Attorney General Richard Hermer

In July, Keir Starmer made headlines when he appointed his longtime colleague Richard Hermer as the attorney general. This transition involved not only ennobling Hermer but also a surprising shake-up in the shadow cabinet, marking the end of Emily Thornberry’s tenure in the role.

Initially, some close to Hermer speculated about his longevity in the position, fearing that the Labour government’s approach might not align with his progressive principles, especially regarding international issues like Israel and the occupation of Palestinian territories. As a barrister with a robust stance on human rights, Hermer’s potential resignation appeared low-risk, as he could easily return to his practice.

Contrary to these speculations, recent weeks have revealed that Hermer might be at risk of dismissal due to perceived overreach in his dedication to principles of justice and law. His assertive style has led to accusations from critics who claim he prioritizes international legalities over national interests.

Among the charges leveled against him, critics have labeled him a “lefty lawyer” whose agenda is seen as detached from the government’s core values. They cite his characterization of the British Empire as “deeply racist” and raise concerns from both fundamental issues and seemingly minor points, such as his decision to reduce a contingency fee from a past legal case.

In a recent interview, Hermer made it clear that he welcomes challenges to the government’s position on international law, signaling his readiness to confront dissenters head-on. “If they want to pick a fight with me over international law’s importance, I’m ready,” he stated emphatically.

Concerns about Hermer’s past legal clients, particularly the implications for current policies like the legacy bill regarding Northern Ireland, have also been a source of contention. However, supporters argue that he follows established protocols to manage any potential conflicts of interest, directing such matters to the solicitor general when necessary.

Intra-party criticism presents a more pressing issue for Hermer. Allegations suggest he is obstructing the government’s objectives and lacks the necessary political savvy. His advocates firmly dispute these claims, arguing that his proven history of tackling challenging legal cases reflects a commitment to protecting the rule of law rather than impeding progress.

Dominic Grieve, a former attorney general, remarked that criticism of Hermer equates to punitive measures against the messenger delivering uncomfortable truths. Colleagues worried about policy blockages need to recognize that Hermer is merely emphasizing the harsh realities of legal frameworks.

Hermer, who has deep roots in Labour politics and opposed Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership due to concerns over electability and antisemitism, remains a point of focus within the party hierarchy. Despite his amiable personality, the ties between him and Starmer have seemingly drawn fire from factions inside the party.

Although Hermer has not been part of the political scene in recent years, his role has gained significance due to Labour’s response to perceived shortcomings from Conservative leadership regarding legal matters. This new prominence may be stirring jealousy or resentment among peers who are used to a different balance of power in cabinet discussions.

The contention surrounding Hermer is reflective of broader anxieties about Starmer’s leadership style, with some indicating that critiques aimed at Hermer often reflect frustration with the prime minister himself. Observers suggest that as long as uncertainties cloud Starmer’s ability to merge effective governance with compelling political messaging, Hermer will likely remain a target of discontent.

In this complex political landscape, the role of attorney general remains contentious. The ongoing discussion about Hermer’s place may shape not only his career but also the future trajectory of Labour under Starmer’s leadership.

Source
www.theguardian.com