Photo credit: www.cbsnews.com
The U.S. Department of Education stands at the brink of potential major transformations, with President Trump poised to sign an executive order calling for the agency’s dissolution. This announcement has sparked significant concerns among parents, students, and taxpayers regarding the future landscape of education services should the department be dismantled.
Understanding the Role of the Department of Education
The Department of Education was established in 1979 when President Jimmy Carter enacted legislation to form the agency. Its primary responsibilities encompass:
- Distributing billions annually in student loans
- Administering the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), which facilitates access to state and federal college financial aid
- Providing funding sources for disadvantaged and disabled students in K-12 education
- Promoting equal educational access through initiatives within its Office of Civil Rights
- Managing the Pell Grant program, offering substantial financial aid to eligible low- and middle-income college students
- Funding public charter schools
- Overseeing the national college accreditation framework by evaluating recognized accrediting bodies
- Gathering and analyzing educational data from primary through higher education
According to Peter Granville, a fellow at The Century Foundation and an expert in higher education, the core function of the Department of Education is to ensure access to educational environments rather than dictating classroom content.
A common misunderstanding among the public is the belief that the Education Department directly dictates school curricula, which is actually the responsibility of state and local authorities. Granville emphasizes that the federal agency primarily focuses on financial aspects, rather than educational content.
Motivations Behind the Proposed Closure
President Trump has been a vocal critic of the Department of Education, labeling it a “big con job” and making various claims regarding educational spending and performance. He has signaled support for “school choice” initiatives through an executive order aimed at expanding educational opportunities for families, which frequently includes the promotion of vouchers for private K-12 education.
In a communication to department staff titled “Our Department’s Final Mission,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon indicated that her objective is to restore educational governance to state control while mitigating perceived overreach from the federal government. This sentiment aligns with the principles outlined in Project 2025, a conservative policy guide developed by the Heritage Foundation, which advocates for localized control over educational funding and policymaking.
The Feasibility of Abolishing the Department
The complete elimination of the Department of Education would require Congressional approval, necessitating a supermajority in the Senate, which is currently improbable. Nevertheless, the Trump administration might pursue modifications, such as workforce reductions within the agency or alterations to its regulatory responsibilities without shutting it down entirely.
Dramatic changes, particularly regarding civil rights oversight, are anticipated. The administration has already directed the Office for Civil Rights to focus on specific issues, such as cases of antisemitism and the involvement of transgender athletes in sports.
Implications for Student Loans
The Department of Education oversees a significant student loan portfolio, totaling approximately $1.5 trillion. Should the agency cease operations, questions arise about the governance of student loans, which some speculate could be transferred to the Treasury Department. Granville cautions that such a transition might encounter disruptions. Additionally, Project 2025 proposes establishing a new governance model for federal loans, promoting an overhaul of existing repayment plans.
The Future of FAFSA
The FAFSA is mandated by law to be made available by October 1 each year, enabling students to apply for federal aid. Granville notes that as long as Congressional statutes remain unchanged, FAFSA’s continuation is legally required, although uncertainty exists over which agency would take over responsibilities if the Education Department dissolves.
Impact on K-12 Schools
The bulk of federal funding for K-12 education flows through substantial programs like Title I, aimed at supporting low-income students and those with disabilities. Trump’s campaign promises included devolving these responsibilities to state governments without offering specific plans on how funding oversight would be maintained.
Project 2025 suggests transitioning oversight to the Department of Health and Human Services, ultimately recommending a phase-out of federal educational funding in favor of grants to states.
Reactions from Educators and Lawmakers
Proposed changes to the Department of Education have raised alarms among educators and lawmakers who argue that dismantling the agency could disadvantage millions of families relying on federal assistance. Critics, including Senator Bernie Sanders, warn that such a shift could lead to increased local taxes to fill funding gaps left by the federal government.
The American Federation of Teachers, advocating on behalf of K-12 educators, has pledged to oppose any efforts to abolish the department. AFT President Randi Weingarten criticized the administration’s narrative about returning education decision-making to states, asserting that local governance is already in place and emphasizing the department’s crucial role in equalizing educational opportunities across the nation.
Source
www.cbsnews.com