Photo credit: www.theguardian.com
“They make a desert and call it peace,” Tacitus noted, echoing sentiments first expressed by Calgacus. In the context of the current crisis, these words resonate sharply as Israel appears to have transformed Gaza into a graveyard, while former President Donald Trump has characterized it as a potential real estate venture. Trump’s recent comments suggest that he envisions the United States taking over the Gaza Strip, proposing that the Palestinians residing there be relocated to neighboring Jordan, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia—assertions that imply a troubling lack of understanding of the complexities involved.
As the conflict escalates, the humanitarian toll raises significant concerns. Fifteen months ago, Gaza was home to approximately 2.1 million people. With the death toll now reported at almost 62,000, many experts believe this figure is a severe undercount, excluding indirect casualties due to disease and famine. Devi Sridhar, an esteemed public health chair at Edinburgh University, highlighted in the Guardian that projections from a Lancet analysis suggest the actual death toll could approach 335,500.
Trump’s comments reflect an alarming acceptance of this humanitarian disaster. During a recent address, he estimated that 1.7 to 1.8 million people in Gaza would need to be relocated. Yet, there seems to be a lack of inquiry by reporters regarding the accuracy of the casualty figures, raising questions about media engagement with the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
Reactions to Trump’s redevelopment theories have been varied, with many describing his ideas as shocking. However, the notion that U.S. and Israeli officials seek to eradicate Palestinian presence in Gaza is not new. Israeli political figures and commentators have long suggested that creating uninhabitable conditions in Gaza is a strategy to expunge Palestinians from the land.
Influencial voices, like Major General Giora Eiland, have publicly declared intentions to make Gaza uninhabitable. Eiland articulated in October 2023 that Israel must either temporarily or permanently render Gaza a place where life is untenable. This sentiment echoes through various Israeli circles, reiterating a troubling narrative surrounding the future of Palestinians in the region.
High-profile figures such as Jared Kushner have expressed ambitions to develop properties in Gaza, proposing that Palestinians be relocated to the Negev desert while Israel “cleans up” the territory. Meanwhile, settler leaders have been exploring locations for new settlements in North Gaza, a development that underscores the broader intent behind the devastation.
Documents and statements from Israeli politicians reveal a consistent rhetoric advocating for the removal of Palestinians from Gaza. This has prompted experts and human rights organizations to classify the ongoing situation as genocidal in nature, with genocide specialist Omer Bartov noting that there is an ongoing effort to displace the population and obliterate their means of existence.
Foreign access to Gaza remains restricted, resulting in limited avenues for comprehensive assessments of the situation. However, those who manage to enter consistently describe dire circumstances. Jan Egeland, head of the Norwegian Refugee Council, cited Gaza as suffering from a “besiegement within a besiegement,” emphasizing that the destruction observed is far from a mere act of self-defense.
Recent statements from Trump’s administration suggest plans for temporary displacement of Palestinians, but history hints that such relocations may not be reversible. Many Palestinians displaced in previous decades have faced ongoing barriers to return, instilling a deep sense of loss and injustice across generations.
At the heart of this issue lies a troubling narrative: that Trump’s forced relocation plan is framed as humanitarian. This facade obscures the stark reality that such proposals are in direct violation of international law, akin to ethnic cleansing, which is categorized legally as a war crime and a crime against humanity. Dr. John Reynolds has underscored that while the terminology is complex, Trump’s wishes align with calls for actions that breach international norms.
Whether Trump’s vision will materialize remains uncertain. However, his rhetoric—and the tacit agreement of many legislators—reveals a disheartening degree of dehumanization directed at Palestinians. In this light, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib’s remarks resonate powerfully: “Palestinians aren’t going anywhere,” she stated, calling for collective accountability among lawmakers in the face of systemic genocide.
Additionally, Tlaib rightly emphasizes the complicity of media narratives in this ongoing crisis. Western media coverage frequently minimizes Palestinian suffering, often neglecting the broader context of violence that characterizes the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Such representations enable dehumanization and provide a platform for dangerous rhetoric, exemplified by Trump’s statements.
Meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while making controversial remarks undermines international legal standards, particularly when considering that an arrest warrant exists for Netanyahu regarding alleged war crimes. The media omission of these critical facts only serves to normalize and legitimize the suffering inflicted upon the Palestinian people.
It is imperative that there be a reexamination of the role of media, lawmakers, and all involved parties in the discourse surrounding Gaza. A shift toward honest acknowledgment of the ongoing crisis and its historical implications is crucial if there is any hope for a durable resolution.
Source
www.theguardian.com