Photo credit: phys.org
Stonehenge Evades ‘At Risk’ Status Amid Highway Controversy
In a significant development, the United Nations’ cultural agency has decided against placing Stonehenge on the list of world heritage sites in danger. This decision emerged from concerns regarding a proposed highway tunnel that could potentially compromise the integrity of the landscape surrounding this iconic prehistoric monument.
Stonehenge, which has stood on Salisbury Plain in southern England for approximately 5,000 years, was constructed in multiple phases, with its distinctive stone circle dating back to the late Neolithic period around 2500 B.C. Recognized for its cultural and historical importance, Stonehenge was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1986.
UNESCO experts had previously suggested that Stonehenge be classified as “in danger” due to ongoing plans for the highway development. The highway project aims to alleviate traffic congestion by relocating a portion of the main highway underground and farther from the stone circle—a concept that has been debated for decades and has faced various legal hurdles.
During the recent 46th session of the World Heritage Committee, representatives from Kenya and Qatar argued that the proposed construction would be sufficient in mitigating any negative impact on the site. They emphasized that the new alignment of the road would place it further from the stone circle, diverging from the concerns highlighted by experts about the broader ramifications of the project on the surrounding landscape.
The proposed highway has met robust opposition from local communities, archaeologists, and conservationists concerned about its potential impact on the environment, local wildlife, and the chances of uncovering new archaeological sites during construction.
Kenya’s adjustment of the original recommendation to classify Stonehenge as in danger highlighted the fact that the central monument would not be directly adjacent to the road under the new proposal. The country noted that Britain had extensively evaluated over fifty alternatives for the highway project.
However, UNESCO experts maintained that the protection of Stonehenge warrants consideration of the entire landscape it is situated in, not just the monument itself. They stated, “What needs to be protected is not just the henge but the overall landscape of which the henge is a central focus.” Their draft proposal emphasized the interconnectedness of Stonehenge with numerous other prehistoric features that shape its ancient environment.
Following the committee’s decision to reject the endangered status for Stonehenge, they have requested that Britain provide an updated report on the conservation state of the site by December 2025. UNESCO has clarified that the designation of a site as “in danger” is intended to raise awareness for conservation efforts, rather than serving as a punitive measure.
Failure to address conservation concerns could potentially lead to Stonehenge’s removal from UNESCO’s World Heritage List, although such an action is rare. As the debate continues, the future of this archaeological treasure remains a focal point of discussion among stakeholders.
Source
phys.org